If You Want Them to RTFM, Make a Better FM

16. May, 2012

If you’re interested in the conflicts between software and documentation, Alex Lagarde wrote a great post about that: Intent Discovery – Part 1 : the intents behind softwares.

It explains what the different (and conflicting) goals are between the “technical space” (source code), “model space” (design and architecture) and “document space” (what people need to use the software successfully). And he promises some solutions with the new Eclipse project “Intent” (and the second post in the series).

Eclipse Suddenly Takes Long to Start Unit Tests

10. May, 2012

When starting a JUnit test in Eclipse suddenly takes ages (the process starts quickly as you can see in the Console view but it takes ages until the tree of tests appears in the JUnit view), you might experience troubles with IPv6.

The background of the issue: Modern OSs assign your network cards two addresses, one for the old IPv4 and one for the new IPv6. When IPv6 isn’t configured correctly, Eclipse will try to connect via this route and it will take some 30 seconds for Eclipse and the JUnitRunner process to begin talking to each other.

The quick fix is to disable IPv6 or to tell Java to prefer IPv4:

Why OSGi Qualifiers Aren’t Working

13. April, 2012

If you don’t understand how OSGi bundles get versions: You’re not alone.

On paper, the rules are pretty simple and straightforward.

In reality, the rules are broken by many Eclipse bundles because the tools don’t help to enforce them (Alex Blewitt wrote two great posts about that: “Why OSGi qualifiers aren’t working” and “Using Humans to solve a Tooling problem“). It’s not a rare problem either. Alex found 10% of the bundles got a new qualifier but didn’t actually change. That doesn’t take bundles into account which did change but the version wasn’t bumped.

When I started on an automated converter to turn Eclipse bundles to Maven artifacts, I hit the same problems. Some bundles get rebuild for no apparent reason, some have changes but the version wasn’t bumped.

This causes some problems. First of all: Which of those two qualifiers is “bigger”? “v20120119-1537” or “xx-20120301-1000-e37-RELEASE”?

And if you think that’s probably a mistake: That’s the qualifier for org.eclipse.jdt.core.source. It’s one of the core bundles for Eclipse. If even the JDT people don’t get it right, there isn’t much hope.

When  building something with Maven, you have something similar: SNAPSHOT versions. But unlike Eclipse,

  • Maven forces you to drop the SNAPSHOT when you build a release
  • Maven replaces the string “SNAPSHOT” in the version with a build timestamp. This gives a consistent version scheme.
  • There are tools that check for SNAPSHOT versions
  • Maven can’t mix SNAPSHOT and releases in a repository (so you’re less likely to accidentally pollute your build or, worse, the build of someone else).

Unfortunately, OSGi have abandoned -SNAPSHOT versions for R5.

But maybe we can fix the problem on the Eclipse side. If you care, support Bug 376718 – Strip qualifiers for release builds.

When Eclipse Won’t Start

13. April, 2012

There can be a couple of reasons why Eclipse refuses to start: Corrupted workspace, broken plugins or conflicting plugins. This blog post is about the last category.

How do you know that you’re affected? Start Eclipse with the command line option -debug. If there is a huge gap between “Time to load bundles” and “Starting application”, you’re on.

Start Eclipse in a debugger and set a breakpoint in org.eclipse.osgi.internal.module.ResolverImpl.findBestCombination(ResolverBundle[], ResolverConstraint[][], int[], List<ResolverConstraint>).

The interesting information is in the variable bestConflictBundles. This is basically a list of bundles that cause some kind of trouble. Usually, this is a bundle which has the singleton flag set but of which are two versions in the plugins folder (or in the plug-in list, if you started Eclipse from another instance of itself).

If you started Eclipse from itself (using a launch configuration), the solution is to open the “Debug Configurations…” editor, select the “Plug-ins” tab:

This tab has several interesting options: You can type (part of) a plug-in ID into the filter field to narrow down the huge list. If the list isn’t active, select “Launch with: plug-ins selected below only” above.

That way, if you want to disable all of BIRT, type “birt” and then click “Deselect all” to the right.

Next stop is the “Validate Plug-ins” button in the bottom left. This opens a dialog with all the problems the current selection has. This dialog isn’t modal! That means you can keep it open while you (de-)select plugins from the list. If your screen is big enough, you can move it so you can see the list and the “Validate” button. That way, you never need to close the dialog.

Otherwise, Alt+V is your friend.

In my example, the org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.db plug-ins cause trouble. As you can see, I pulled them out with a short text in the filter. Now, I can get rid of them with a single click on “Deselect all”. Validate … okay, things for worse.

But I don’t need anything from JPT for my tests, so I get rid of the whole lot. Validate … “No problems were detected.”


How I Came to Hate Orbit

29. February, 2012

Orbit is an Eclipse project which contains IP clean OSS code to be used in Eclipse projects.

Why is that important? Well, IP clean means that big companies who consume Eclipse code, can use it safely (their lawyers have to check the EPL once and after that, their developers can use any code they can find on eclipse.org).

Now, Eclipse writes a lot of source code but not everything. commons-io, for example, contains a lot of code which would be really cool to have for Eclipse projects.

Orbit was created to have just that: Copies of OSS code from all kinds of places relicensed under the EPL. Sweet.

Enter stage: maven.eclipse.org

The idea behind maven.eclipse.org is to provide projects outside of the Eclipse foundation a place where they can find Eclipse’s OSGi bundles as Maven artifacts (which are easier to consume when you build your projects with Maven). Sweet 2.

To make the Eclipse bundles available on maven.eclipse.org, I need to convert them. Part of that process is to assign each Eclipse bundle (which has bundle ID and a version) a Maven coordinate (which consists of group ID, artifact ID and version). That’s not always simple but I’ve found a rule that works pretty well.

If it wasn’t for Orbit.

Orbit contains bundles which you can also find on Maven central. One example is commons-io.

And Orbit didn’t simply copy the JAR from Maven Central – they changed it. In this case, the changes are purely for legal reasons (EPL license, moved a couple of files around). Not a big problem here. I could map the two to the same coordinate – except that you would sometimes build software which contains code licensed by Apache and sometimes code which is licensed by EPL. Worse, some other code might be under the viral GPL on Maven Central – linking that could turn your project into open source! Not a problem for most developers but it could be a problem for your legal department and guess which head is going to roll?

But there is more.

Let’s have a look at … org.apache.batik.pdf. This is a fragment of the Batik’s rasterizer JAR from Maven Central. In this case, we have several issues:

  • Orbit has split a single artifact from Maven Central into several Orbit bundles. Which bundle should get the same coordinate as the original Maven Artifact?
  • The Orbit bundle also contains code from commons-io and commons-logging. So it pollutes your classpath with classes that you don’t expect. Worse, someone (not the Eclipse guys) removed “unnecessary” methods from some classes copied from commons-io. So if the compiler sees this JAR on the classpath, you will get errors for many methods in the class IOUtils. Bad.
  • Some Orbit bundles have bugs fixed but the version hasn’t been changed – only the qualifier changed which works if you use OSGi to build your classpath but Maven doesn’t. A couple of bundles from org.apache.batik are among them (bug 329376).

While it might make sense from Orbit’s point of view to do this, it makes my life a bit complicated.

Maven Tool 4 Eclipse 0.10.0 Released

12. January, 2012

I’ve just release a new version of Maven Tools 4 Eclipse (Changelog). It fixes the two most pressing issues:

  • Bug 367461 – [mt4e] mt4e needs priming.zip
  • Bug 354381 – Error: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: args for class: m4e.ImportTool

Have Fun!

Building BIRT with Tycho

27. December, 2011

If you want to see BIRT built with Tycho, vote for this bug: [Build] Migrate build to Tycho

Push Button Builds

8. September, 2011

A few days ago, kingargyle posted about “Push Button Builds.” The idea is that building a software should be as simple as triggering a light switch.

A good example are Maven (mvn install) or most automake builds (configure && make && make install). They usually just work and if they fail, they give you some context to work from.

A good negative example are Eclipse PDE builds: Often there is no build script. If there is a build script, it will fail with an obscure error message in an Ant script that was recursively called by about 100 other Ant scripts. Each Eclipse project uses PDE but each build has different prerequisites (which you must know). If the build uses p2 repositories, there is no way of telling whether two subsequent builds will produce the same result. Some projects try really hard to help newcomers to build their stuff with a recipe that needs 100+ easy steps. In four words: It’s a mess.

Or a surefire way to attract only the most dedicated committers because everyone else will be utterly demotivated very quickly (and you don’t want those, do you? 😉

So like Dave Carver, I would like to spread the idea. Make builds more simple. Here is an example and following Dave’s advice, I’m going to make the build script even more simple.

Why a script and not, say, a web site with instructions? Several reasons:

  1. A script will make you more dedicated. It’s easy to be sloppy with a README. With a script, at least the syntax will be right.
  2. When a README fails, you won’t really know what to do next. With a script, you have a very precise starting point for a bug report: “The setup script failed in line 15” vs. “Install with Maven … and which version?”
  3. Scripts can prepare the environment. Since you don’t want to make anyone angry, create a new directory and put everything in there. Download what you need, unpack it, configure it. If you can’t do it with a script, why should a newcomer fare better?
  4. Can’t download something? You can always print an error message with exact instructions: Go to website … download xxx, version yyy … put it here. In a script, you can say ‘echo “Put download into $build_dir”‘ Try that in a README.
  5. You can prove that a script works. Good luck trying that with a README.
  6. You can run scripts on a CI server to make sure they work.
  7. A script always needs an interpreter. Bash scripts run on Mac and Linux. What about Windows users? Well, 100% of the Windows users build OSS software from .msi files. The tiny rest has three options: a) Read the bash script, b) install Cygwin/MinGW, c) install Linux.

Restoring a Corrupted Workspace in Eclipse

2. September, 2011

When Eclipse is starting to act weird or completely refuses to start, the .metadata probably got corrupted. Now what? You could delete the .metadata directory and waste a couple of hours to restore the IDE to a useful state.

Here are some tips to speed up the process a lot:

  1. If Eclipse still works, export your preferences.
  2. Try to start Eclipse with -clean. That flushes some caches which might have become corrupted.
  3. Start Eclipse, wait for all builds and background activity to stop and then kill it using your OS’ tools. When Eclipse restarts, it will notice it has crashed and do some more cleanup / distrust more caches.
  4. Install the Bulk Import plugin to save list of projects and their state.
  5. Instead of deleting .metadata/, rename it.
  6. Restore the folder “.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.core.runtime/.settings” from the backup. This is basically the same as the preferences. Kudos to Tomas Kramar for figuring that one out.
  7. Restart Eclipse. You should get an empty workspace but all your preferences should be there.
  8. Use the buttons in the toolbar to restore all your projects.

Another useful plugin is the “save UI state” which saves the workspace layout and open editors after every change (based on the code here).

With a way to preserve your preferences, saving the project state the workspace layout, you should be able to quickly restore the IDE.

Related articles:

  • Eclipse Dance Steps – “Sometime Eclipse fails to work as expected. The following ‘dances’, in increasing order of desperation, may help. Remember to maintain a fixed grin throughout and try not to tread on your own toes.”

New Release of MT4E

24. August, 2011

Note: This post is now obsolete since there is a newer release.

I just finished a new release of Maven Tools 4 Eclipse. It’s not written in Groovy and supports all the features of the old Python version plus a few new ones.

You can find instructions how to use it on the wiki page.

For now, you need to build the tool from source (which needs 1.4-SNAPSHOT from DecentXML) using Maven. I’m in discussion with the people at Eclipse to get a download link for the binary.

Update: The project page now has a download link.

%d bloggers like this: