Why Beating Up a Child is a Bad Idea

16. February, 2009

Most people believe that beating a child is bad but they believe this for the wrong reasons. Apart from the obvious (harming their unconditional trust in the parent or, worse, harming them physically for life or even accidentally killing them), there are two reasons against it: First, it doesn’t work and second, it will send the wrong message.

When a parent beats a child, all other means have failed. “The child just won’t listen”. So the idea is to use pain to drive the message home. The first big problem with this approach is this: The child will try to avoid the pain more than the behavior which leads to the pain — if it even makes the connection; the pain comes from you, not from what it did some time ago. From the infants point of view, to avoid the pain, it is more effective to make sure you don’t notice the behavior anymore than to stop the behavior.

If it was the other way around, the child would have stopped the behavior already before the parent felt that violence was the only option left.

So in summary, beating a child will first train it to become a better liar, rather than change its behavior.

The second problem is the message you send by resorting to physical violence. Children are hormonally controlled into believing that anything the parent does is “correct”. That is why they naturally mimic (“copy”) the behavior of the parents — any behavior, even the traits that we don’t like about ourselves. Now, you’ve hit your child, what does it learn?

It has learned that hitting someone else is OK. Because if it wasn’t, then you wouldn’t do it. QED. It has also learned that pain is another way to get what it wants. The more often is is beaten, the lower the barrier will get. For the first beating, it will link the behavior to “last resort”. If it happens regularly, it will adjust accordingly.

So next time, you feel the urge to hit your child, ask yourself these questions:

  • Is that what I want to teach my child?
  • Is it possible that the child is copying my own behavior in this instance?

In the latter case, the message will be even worse: The child just did something you do and it got punished for it. How could it ever resolve a conflict that you, an adult, can’t?

So what can you do?

The most simple solution is to walk away for a few minutes. It will help you cool down, to get a clear head. No one can make good decisions in the heat of the moment and no one can force you to do it. Being a parent hasn’t suddenly turned you into Superman (and even Superman had years of training to become as calm as he is). Also, don’t underestimate the power of ignoring. Just make sure the child understands that you are walking away because it just did something wrong — and that you will be back. Guess what the child will be thinking while you’re away?

After getting some distance, first calm down. Then assess the situation. How bad is it after all? Can you let it slip? If not, decide for a new rule to set up. Consider how you want to implement the new rule.

Complete these thoughts and decisions before you return and explain them to your child. If you feel insecure about them, then don’t bother to even try to set them up because your child will notice that you’re not really behind the new rules. You would be sending the message “this is not that important” and not get the desired result. Be honest to yourself. If you’re not really behind it, then the whole issue probably wasn’t so important after all.


The Bad Old Times

13. February, 2009

If you ever need a convincing argument for someone who strongly believes that “in former times, everything was better”, try this: Ask them if they believe in the Greek Philosophy, the principles of logic, deduction and society on which todays wealth and freedom are built. If they do, let them know this:

“The Greeks considered it normal for any man to be drawn to the beauty of a boy—just as much if not more than to that of a woman.”

As with everything, the past is not better in every respect than today and vice versa. That said, we do learn from past mistakes and try to avoid them and more often than not, we succeed. This also is human nature.

Source: Pederasty in ancient Greece


Your Problems Are New? Think Again!

12. February, 2009

Most problems that we are contemplating today are the same as 2’000 years ago. Here is a guy who posts one or two of Seneca’s thought every week: Letters from a Stoic


Great Resource For Bloggers

9. February, 2009

If you want to improve your skills as a blogger (or as a writer in general), this is a great resource: copyblogger.com


The Cost of Safety

6. February, 2009

Worried about your safety? The safety of your wife/daughter/son/house/car/whatever? If you did worry about something like that in the past, when considering options to make something more safe, did you consider the cost?

Paul Graham wrote a nice essay “Artists Ship” (after the remark by Steve Jobs). Please ignore his “only programmers love to work hard”. The rest of the argument is very convincing. When people talk about “improving” some situation (crime rate, child abuse, revenue streams), they often propose solutions but there is little to no discussion about the cost of said “solution”.

So we want to protect our children against molesters. Fair enough. Only in the discussion, you can’t argue with reason because it’s so emotional. People don’t know anything about the reasons why someone becomes a pedophile or how (and if at all) this can be treated. They want a “solution”, completely ignorant of the cost. It’s a fact that “better” solutions (which will catch more violators) will always harm more innocent people.

Let’s look at a related case. Make up your mind about this case: “Julie Amero, a 40-year-old substitute teacher from Connecticut is facing up to 40 years in prison for exposing her seventh grade class to a cascade of pornographic imagery.” (more). Guilty? Innocent? What’s “exposing” supposed to mean here? Did she show them intentionally? Such a simple case and so many questions …

Say I want to write a program that automatically searches the Internet for child pr0n and sends alerts to the authorities. I can’t. It’s not possible anymore in any western country because I could neither test my program nor use it: Even the download of child pr0n is illegal. It’s illegal before a human can see it. I wonder how all those web filters work … Maybe they build them in a country where child abuse is not illegal.

So you like to watch pr0n but don’t want to pay? The Internet is full of “free” ware. But downloading “good.jpg” might get you into jail, depending on what you might find in the image afterwards. Guilty? Innocent?

Most computers on the Internet are vulnerable to all kinds of attacks. It’s ridiculously simple to spread viruses and worms which effectively take over your computer. Who is guilty when a cracker puts illegal pictures on your PC? You, because you didn’t understand the technology? You, because it is too hard to catch the cracker? You, because the prosecution doesn’t understand the technology, either? You, because the jury can’t follow the explanations of the experts anymore?

On the other hand, a clever pervert might infect his computer deliberately, so he can always say “it was the virus!”. With todays paint software, how hard is it to replace the head of an adult with one of a child and reduce the cup size? How hard is it to prove that the picture is real? How about pencil drawings? You do know that most paint programs come with “artistic filters”.

Such topics tend to become witch hunts where anyone can potentially be as guilty as we want them to be. Justice isn’t blind to protect the successful criminal, she’s blind in order to protect the innocent against prejudice.

So next time, you ask for a new rule, think about the cost, first.

Btw. During the research for this article, I googled for “teacher england hacker child porn“. Condemn me.

Links (in the order in which I stumbled over them):


Hit Them Harder Until They Learn

23. December, 2008

Do you believe that hitting people harder will make them learn? No? Do you believe that prison will turn a bad person into a good citizen? If not, why don’t you do something about it?

People like simple solutions. Out of the eyes, problem solved. Lock someone up, it will turn them into a nice fellow. Because you don’t like to be locked up, you believe that others feel the same. The question remains: Why should locking up someone turn them into a better person?

Well, it does work … for monks. They willingly lock themselves up somewhere to be able to concentrate on those things that are dear to them and where they want to improve. But there is a big difference between locking up yourself (like a hermit) and locking up someone with a bunch of criminals and guards. Just make a wild guess where most criminals learn their trade …

The relapse rates vary a lot (by age, type of crime, prison, treatment). Still, I’m more astonished by the fact that not all of the inmates become criminal again rather than the fact that some do.

That said, it is refreshing when you meet people who don’t fall for the temptation of retribution. The guys at stackoverflow.com recently discovered that some people gamed the system to hurt other members or to increase their status. Instead of punishing them, they decided to just take away any advantage of trying to game the system. Problem really solved. Carry on, commander!

Links: Vote Fraud And You
Ein Gefängnisersatz mit Rückfallquote null (German)
GEFÄNGNIS – LEBEN HINTER GITTERN (German)


I Have Nothing to Hide … I Think

10. November, 2008

So it has happened again. Someone put a nice web site online and when it came to pick and chose between security and comfort, guess who won. Alas, those who do as you shouldn’t still server as a bad example. What has happened?

DHL, a German parcel delivery service, offers a web site where you can track where your brand new gadget is now so you can guess how long it will take until you rip the wrapping off it. That good.

Not so good is that all customers of DHL get the same default password.

Bad is that DHL reuses the tracking numbers after roughly six months (depending on the amount of parcels that go through the system; if there are less, you can look further into the past).

Really bad is that part of DHL’s tracking number of fixed. It’s based on the DHL customer number. That’s not you, this “customer” is the guy or company you ordered from (DHL renders a service for them).

So this leaves us with a convenient way to check who else has ordered anything from those that shop.

Now imagine you ordered something innocent … oh, maybe porn or “adult toys” or something from company B which is the arch enemy of company A which incidentally pays your wage. All of a sudden, a couple of innocent bits of information have turned ugly.

Whenever you put something out to the world, step away for a few moments from your dreams how much good someone could do with your service and think how much bad someone could do with it. And if you can’t think of anything, you should be very, very worried.


Name of the Longest Distance Between Two Points

7. October, 2008

Q: What’s the name of the shortest distance between two points?

A: The straight line.

Q: What’s the name of the longest distance between two points?

A: The shortcut.


Quantity Always Trumps Quality

4. August, 2008

While I wouldn’t completely subscribe to that without a grain of salt, the story is nice.


FREE! Really.

28. July, 2008

I just found a nice comment under my blog. It offered a free service. One sentence was: “REGISTRATION IS ABSOLUTELY FREE!” When you see that, you know you’re being ripped off. I’m not mentioning the name of the guys who tried that stunt in order to give them no additional advertisement. ‘Nuff said.

Tip: If you want me to join your planet or RSS mega feed or whatever, it’s not smart to post a comment in my blog. This is my blog, my reputation, my honor. I decide who gets free advertisement here.